Diversity Types
There are four basic forms of diversity circuitry in use today, and numerous
variations on these basic designs. All have advantages as well as disadvantages
depending on the quality of the receiver circuitry.
Antenna Diversity - Not Active
This type of diversity utilizes three or more antennas in widely separated
areas. In this approach there is little chance of a phase cancellation occurring
at all three locations simultaneously. However, since all three antennas are
connected to a single input, they can act as an array. In addition, while this
approach solves phase cancellation, the sum of the three antennas is never as
good as the best signal alone, so there is always a compromise in signal
quality. This approach involves a lot of cable and splitters making the design
time-consuming to install. While inexpensive, it is rarely used anymore due to
the compromises.
Switching Diversity
This is the most common form of diversity in use today for wireless
microphone systems. This approach originally came from radio use during World
War II. During war time, the reliability of the communications was a constant
concern, not only from a reliability of the radio signal from phase
cancellations and multipath, but also from a logistical standpoint where the
radio men were often placed in great danger of being blown to bits, radio and
all. Radios placed in separate locations often solved both problems, so the
duplication of resources became very widespread. This same principle is used
today in wireless microphone receivers although the circuitry to accomplish this
task has become far more so 1940s.
In contemporary wireless systems, two antennas and two complete receiver sections are used, along with a comparator circuit which monitors the receiver with the strongest signal. When one receiver begins to lose signal, the comparator switches the audio to the other receiver. Although this method can be effective, this type of design can also have problems from receivers that are not properly matched. This imbalance usually leads to noise from one of the receivers or from the switching network. These designs are expensive to produce because two receivers must be made, and consequently, the designers can compromise on important circuitry areas such as RF & IF filtering in order to keep the price competitive, especially in low cost systems. Another probable area of concern is that each receiver can change with time, and over the long run can change from the other, further compromising the performance of the system.
There are several variations of this basic design on the market today. Some of these include soft switching between receivers to eliminate the harsh transients that can occur when a poor signal is suddenly replaced by a good signal. Either type of design can be effective provided the receivers are matched, and the RF & IF filtering is not compromised.
Antenna Switching Diversity - Active
Antenna switching diversity uses a single high-quality receiver, along with
two isolated antenna inputs fed to a signal strength comparator. When the signal
begins to deteriorate in the primary antenna, the comparator selects the other
antenna to try to improve the signal strength. Since this diversity technique
only requires one receiver, the designer will often make a receiver with
superior RF & IF filtering for the same given price point as the twin receiver
diversity. This single high quality receiver will often provide superior
performance in sensitivity, selectivity and IM rejection, however, the antenna
switching circuitry switches blindly regardless of whether or not the current
signal is the strongest of the two. The result can be a switch to a weaker
signal than the first which adds noise, and possible drop-outs into the signal
path.
Phase Diversity - Active
This patented type of diversity utilizes two antennas spaced an optimum
distance apart, which are connected into a single high-quality receiver. The
antenna signals are connected internally to microprocessor logic circuits that
monitor the phase relationship between the two antennas. Both antennas are
active at all creases the signal strength under normal conditions.
In the event of a signal interruption from a partial phase cancellation (multipath) or total phase cancellation (drop-out) the logic circuitry adjusts the phase of one of the antennas to a positive condition relative to the other which instantly corrects the phase can second, and continually adjusts the phase of the antenna for the most optimum signal. A similar patented technique is used in cellular telephones to insure their reliable operation. This type of diversity is very effective and less costly than switching diversity because only one receiver is built. This approach allows the manufacturer to concentrate on the more important aspects of receiver design such as filtering and audio circuits which generally yields superior performance over switching diversity designs.
This technology is patented which allows only one manufacturer to build this design. The disadvantage to this design however is that if the phase logic circuitry is not designed properly, the system can be noisy when the circuitry adjusts the phase relationship.
Active Diversity - General
It's important to note that any diversity circuitry can improve the usable
range of a wireless microphone system provided the antennas are properly
located, and the balance of the receiver circuitry is not compromised. The
diversity circuit itself does not increase the range but rather it makes the
effective range more trouble free. Another important fact is that none these
circuits are clairvoyant.
All forms of diversity except the antenna diversity technique must see some degradation of the signal before the circuitry will react to correct the phase cancellation. Most well designed diversity circuits regardless of the design are effective, and the actual performance of the receiver is affected far more by receiver RF & IF filter design which is discussed next. The thing to watch here is any manufacturer that tries to discredit another manufacturer's designs. In practical application, the advantages and disadvantages mentioned will generally show-up by simple range and audio quality tests.